The refusal of providing such data may result in the refusal of the agreement conclusion.ĩ. You provide the personal data voluntarily, however they are necessary to conclude the agreement. You have the right to demand an access to your personal data, to correct or to delete the data if there is no other basis for the processing or any other purpose of such processing or to limit the processing of the data, to transfer the data to another administrator and to raise objections to the further data processing if there is no legal basis for further processing and to withdraw any previous consent.Ĩ. APD shall keep the data for the period of any civil law claim execution connected with the agreement.ħ. Your personal data shall be processed within the period of the agreement and upon your additional consent until you withdraw it. Your personal data shall not be transferred to the third country, nor to the international bodies.Ħ. Entities entitled to the reception of your personal data may be the authorised public bodies mail providers providers of the services covered by the agreement responsible for debt recovery, keeping the archives, document utilization, legal consulting, technical services, IT services and accountancy.ĥ. 6 section 1 letter a, b and f of RODO in order to:Ī) prepare, conclude and execute the agreement and for other purposes approved by you,ī) to execute the legitimate interest like marketing of products and the agreement, claim assertion or defence against claims resulting from the law regulations.Ĥ. Data Protection Inspector can be reached through e-mail: Your personal data are to be processed on the basis of art. EVERMOTION S.C., 8 Przędzalniana Str., 15-688 Białystok, Poland is the Administrator of your Personal Data (APD)Ģ. 13 section 1 and 2 of the European Parliament and Council Regulation 2016/679 of the 27th April, 2016 on the protection of natural persons, with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), hereafter RODO, I hereby inform that:ġ. Tory MP Sir Geoffrey Cox KC, a former attorney general, said last night: 'It's difficult to see, given the very clear rules that the profession requires, how you could justify refusing instructions for political reasons". It is described as 'an essential safeguard of access to justice, the public interest, and the rule of law' by the Bar Standards Board, which regulates barristers. In English law, the so-called cab rank rule means a barrister must take a case that is within their knowledge and expertise, provided they are free to do so, no matter how unpalatable the cause 'This declaration doesn't sit very well with that principle'Īnother senior legal figure, who did not want to be named, said: 'It seems absurd, a piece of virtue signalling by Lefty lawyers" and you represent clients without fear or favour 'When you are a lawyer, you put your personal views aside. The importance of that independence is not about one's individual views but the interests of justice, and I do think that's a very odd approach to take, frankly, and not really consistent with the role of a lawyer When lawyers start picking and choosing, in a way it undermines the independence of the legal profession Tory MP Robert Buckland, a King's Counsel & former justice secretary, called the declaration 'very odd', saying: 'There are plenty of people lawyers represent who are deeply unpleasant and deeply unpopular, such as rapists and paedophiles. The move triggered fierce condemnation last night from senior members of the legal profession, who accused the group of undermining the convention that everyone is entitled to fair legal representation. Prominent lawyers understood to be involved are Jolyon Maugham KC, founder of the Good Law Project, & Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC, chair of the British Institute of Human Rights "Leading lawyers have been accused of undermining the legal system by declaring that they will not prosecute climate activistsĪround 120 top legal professionals are set to sign a 'Declaration of Conscience' vowing to refuse their services in prosecuting protesters from eco-groups such as Just Stop Oil & Extinction RebellionĪmid accusations of virtue signalling, the group – who call themselves 'Lawyers are Responsible' – will also refuse to act on behalf of clients involved in (*new*) #oilandgas on the grounds that they are destroying the environment. and as usual they're making the same #category #error putting climate collapse in the same category as other 'unpleasant' cases, as well as labelling this "left" and making it a #culturewars issue rather than about whether we All get to eat and drink. And the establishment really don't like it. A number of #leading #lawyers have decided to speak out about the #climate #genocide that others in the #legal #profession are colluding in, or even profiting from.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |